Morphological and anatomical variation in Mexican populations of Pseudotsuga (Pinaceae)

Authors

  • Valentín J. Reyes Hernández Programa Forestal, Colegio de Postgraduados
  • J. Jesús Hernández Programa Forestal, Colegio de Postgraduados
  • Javier López Upton Programa Forestal, Colegio de Postgraduados
  • Humberto Vaquera Huerta Programa en Estadística, Colegio de Postgraduados

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21829/abm70.2005.987

Keywords:

ecotypes, Mexico, morphological differentiation, Pinaceae, Pseudotsuga, putative taxa, variance components

Abstract

Using morphological and anatomical traits of cones, leaves and branchlets, the geographic pattern of variation was evaluated in natural populations of Pseudotsuga in Mexico. Vegetative and reproductive samples were collected from a total of 293 trees in 19 populations located throughout the native range of this genus in Mexico. Characters considered as important from a taxonomic point of view were included in order to verify the taxonomic boundaries of the components of this genus in the region. A strong differentiation among populations was detected for most morphological and anatomical traits, with 22 to 92% of the phenotypic variation residing at this level. The geographical region of origin had an important role in the separation of samples, suggesting the presence of geographic ecotypes of Pseudotsuga in Mexico. Given the fact that differentiation associated with putative taxa was much lower than differentiation associated to geographic regions, it is concluded that there are no morphological bases to separate the Pseudotsuga species that have been proposed earlier for Mexico.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anónimo. 1994. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-ECOL-1994 que determina las especies y subespecies de flora y fauna silvestres terrestres y acuáticas en peligro de extinción y que establece especificaciones para su protección. Diario Oficial de la Federación. Mayo de 1994. 54 pp.

Anónimo. 1998. SAS/STAT Guide for personal computers. Version 8.0. SAS Institute Inc Cary, NC.

Anónimo. 2002. Segunda sección-SEMARNAT. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-ECOL2001. Protección ambiental-especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestrescategorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio - lista de especies en riesgo. Diario Oficial de la Federación. Marzo de 2002. 85 pp.

Cochran, W. G. 1940. The analysis of variance when experimental errors follow the Poisson or binomial laws. Ann. Math. Stat. 11: 335-347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177731871

Crisci, J. 1994. La especie: realidad y conceptos. In: Llorente J. e I. Luna (eds.). Taxonomía biológica. Ediciones Científicas Universitarias. Fondo de Cultura Económica. México, D.F. pp. 53-64.

Debreczy, Z. e I. Racz. 1995. New species and varieties of conifers from Mexico. Phytologia 78: 217-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.11916

Farjon, A. 1990. Pinaceae: drawings and descriptions of the genera Abies, Cedrus, Pseudolarix, Keteleeria, Nothotsuga, Tsuga, Cathaya, Pseudotsuga, Larix and Picea. Koeltz Scientific Books. Königstein. pp. 177-191.

Flous, F. 1934. Diagnoses d'espèces et variétés nouvelles de Pseudotsuga americains. Travaux du Laboratoire Forestier de Toulouse. Tomo I, Vol. 2, Art. VI. Toulouse. 18 pp.

Furman, B. J., D. Grattapaglia, W. S. Dvorak y D. M. O'Malley. 1997. Analysis of genetic relationship of Central American and Mexican pines using RAPD markers that distinguish species. Molecular Ecology 6: 321-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.1997.00183.x

Gernandt, D. S y A. Liston. 1999. Internal transcribed spacer region evolution in Larix and Pseudotsuga (Pinaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 86(5): 711-723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2656581

Hermann, R. K. 1982. The genus Pseudotsuga: historical records and nomenclature. Special Publication 2a. School of Forestry. Forest Research Laboratory. Oregon State University. Corvallis. 29 pp.

Hermann, R. K. y D. P. Lavender. 1990. Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco. In: Burns R. y B. H. Honkala (coord. téc.). Silvics of North America. Vol. 1, Conifers. USDA Forest Service. Washington, D.C. pp. 527-540.

Hillis, D. M. 1987. Molecular versus morphological approaches to systematics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 23-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.000323

Kung, F. H. 1988. Application of data transformation in forest genetics. Silvae Gen. 37(2): 45-49.

Little, E. L. Jr. 1979. Checklist of United States trees (native and naturalized). USDA Forest Service. Agricultural Handbook N° 541. 375 pp.

Liston, A., W. A. Robinson, D. Piñero, y E. R. Álvarez-Buylla. 1999. Phylogenetics of Pinus (Pinaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer region sequences. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 11: 95-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.1998.0550

López U., J., J. Jasso M., J. Vargas H. y J. C. Ayala S. 1993. Variación de características morfológicas en conos y semillas de Pinus greggii Engelm. Agrociencia 3(1): 81-95.

Martínez, M. 1963. Las pináceas mexicanas. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. 3a ed. México, D.F. pp. 27-74.

Martínez, M. 1997. Sistemática molecular: comparación entre diferentes métodos y sus aplicaciones. Bol. Soc. Bot. Méx. 60: 123-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.1525

McDonald, J. A. 1993. Phytogeography and history of the alpine-subalpine flora of northeastern México. In: Ramamoorthy T. P., R. Bye, A. Lot y J. Fa (eds.). Biological diversity of Mexico: origins and distribution. Oxford Univ. Press. Nueva York. pp. 681-703.

Downloads

Published

2005-01-01

How to Cite

Reyes Hernández, V. J., Hernández, J. J., López Upton, J., & Vaquera Huerta, H. (2005). Morphological and anatomical variation in Mexican populations of Pseudotsuga (Pinaceae). Acta Botanica Mexicana, (70), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.21829/abm70.2005.987
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    2436
  • PDF (Español)
    876

Issue

Section

Research article

Metrics

Most read articles by the same author(s)