Morphology and variation of the diatom Aulacodiscus margaritaceaus (Bacillariophyta)

Authors

  • David U. Hernandez-Becerril Centro de Investigaciones de Quintana Roo
  • Norberto Pasten Miranda Centro de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas de la Universidad de Sonora

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21829/abm26.1994.687

Keywords:

fishes, morphotypes, stomach contents, valve

Abstract

Numerous specimens of the diatom Aulacodiscus margaritaceus Ralfs were found in the stomach contents of Atherinid fishes from the Gulf of California. This species was studied by light and scanning electron microscopy. The general morphology is consistent with earlier descriptions: the valve presents fairly coarse, loculate areolae closed by cribra on the outside and open to the inside by large foramina. However, externally the valve shows rather large granules lying on the porose cribra. Their density is variable, but in larger specimens the granules are densely distributed. There are tubular, external processes near the margin of the valve. The number of these processes may vary from 4 to 6 (4 to 10 in specimens of the type material), and it is common to find them broken. The processes end internally in horse-shoe shaped slits. On the internal valve surface hyaline rays sometimes run from the valve center to the rimoportulae. Comments are provided on the variability of this species, as well as on the origin of the external large granules.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous, 1975. Proposals for a standardization of diatom terminology and diagnoses. Nova Hedwigia, Beih. 53: 323-354.

Burke, J. F. & J. B. Woodward. 1963-1974. A review of the genus Aulacodiscus. Statenlsland Inst. Arts Sci., New York 1-357.

Hasle, G. R. 1978. Diatoms. In: Sournia, A. (ed.). Phytoplankton Manual, UNESCO, Paris, pp. 136-142.

Hernández-Becerril, D. U. 1987. A checklist of planktonic diatoms and dinoflagellates from the Gulf of California. Nova Hedwigia 45(1-2): 237-261.

Holmes, R. W. & A. Mahood. 1980. Aulacodiscus kittoni Arnott- Distribution and morphology on the West coast of the United States. Br. Phycol. J. 15: 377-389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071618000650381

Lewin, J. C. 1974. Blooms of surf-zone diatoms along the coast of the Olympic Peninsula, Washingrton. III. Changes in the species composition of the blooms since 1925. Nova Hedwigia, Beih. 45: 251-257.

Licea Durán, S. 1974. Sistemática y distribución de las diatomeas de la Laguna de Agiabampo, Son./ Sin., México. An. Centr. Cienc. Mar y Limnol. 1: 99-156.

Rattray, J. 1888. A revision of the genus Aulacodiscus Ehrb. J. Royal Microsc. Soc., ser. 3, 8: 337-382, pls. 5-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1888.tb01691.x

Ross, R., E. J. Cox, N. I. Karrayeva, D. G. Mann, T. B. B. Paddock, R. Simonsen, R. & P. A. Sims. 1979. An amended terminology for the siliceous components of the diatom cell. Nova Hedwigia, Beih. 64: 513-533.

Ross, R. & P. Sims. 1970. Studies of Aulacodiscus with the scanning electron microscope. Nova Hedwigia, Beih. 31: 49-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1127/nova.beihefte/31/1970/49

Rossa, R. & P. Sims. 1974. Observations on family and generic limits in the Centrales. Nova Hedwigia, Beih. 45: 97-121, pls.

Round, F. E., R. M. Crawford & D. G. Mann. 1990. The Diatoms. Biology and morphology of the genera. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. 747 pp.

Sims, P. & R. W. Holmes. 1983. Studies in the “kittonii” group of Aulacodiscus species. Bacillaria 6: 267-302 (5 pls. incl.).

Venkateswarlu, v. & F. E. Round. 1973. Observations on Aulacodiscus amherstia sp. Nov. from the Bay of Bengal. Br. Phycol. J. 8: 163-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071617300650181

Downloads

Published

1994-01-01

How to Cite

Hernandez-Becerril, D. U., & Pasten Miranda, N. (1994). Morphology and variation of the diatom Aulacodiscus margaritaceaus (Bacillariophyta). Acta Botanica Mexicana, (26), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.21829/abm26.1994.687
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    1062
  • PDF (Español)
    602

Issue

Section

Research article

Metrics